Saturday, August 3, 2013

Operation Northwoods: the Proof that US Government Could Harm Americans

Most Americans believe our government would never harm its own citizens. They would never believe that US leaders could actually be capable of instigating attacks like those of 911. 

Many people believe that the Bush administration took advantage of 9-11 in order to launch the war and impose repressive measures at home. In reality Washington did not just take advantage of 9-11, rather, it instigated 9-11!

Just as the Joint Chiefs of Staff proposed instigating fake attacks on Americans in 1962, the 9-11 attack was justifiable to these twisted people - to create a climate where military action- though I'm not sure they anticipated 3 towers coming down. As for the campaign of repression at home - with its nightmarish Homeland Security, its assault on legal guarantees, and its star chamber Military Tribunals - this campaign is in part intended to silence the millions of people who suspect that Bush and other top leaders were involved in some way in making 9-11 happen. People ask me, how can you believe that our leaders are capable of such cynicism, murderous cruelty, ruthlessness and dishonesty? That is why Operation Northwoods is so important. For we now know that in 1962, the Joint Chiefs of Staff proposed staging phony attacks to destroy U.S. property and killing Cuban refugees and U.S. citizens, in order to create a wave of indignation and rage, to justify an invasion of Cuba that could have killed hundreds of thousands of people and possibly led to nuclear war.

Code named Operation Northwoods, the plan, which had the written approval of the Chairman and every member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, called for innocent people to be shot on American streets; for boats carrying refugees fleeing Cuba to be sunk on the high seas; for a wave of violent terrorism to be launched in Washington, D.C., Miami, and elsewhere. People would be framed for bombings they did not commit; planes would be hijacked. Using phony evidence, all of it would be blamed on Castro, thus giving Lemnitzer and his cabal the excuse, as well as the public and international backing, they needed to launch their war.

The idea may actually have originated with President Eisenhower in the last days of his administration. With the Cold War hotter than ever and the recent U-2 scandal fresh in the public's memory, the old general wanted to go out with a win. He wanted desperately to invade Cuba in the weeks leading up to Kennedy's inauguration; indeed, on January 3 he told Lemnitzer and other aides in his Cabinet Room that he would move against Castro before the inauguration if only the Cubans gave him a really good excuse. Then, with time growing short, Eisenhower floated an idea. If Castro failed to provide that excuse, perhaps, he said, the United States "could think of manufacturing something that would be generally acceptable." What he was suggesting was a pretext a bombing, an attack, an act of sabotage carried out secretly against the United States by the United States. Its purpose would be to justify the launching of a war. It was a dangerous suggestion by a desperate president.

Although no such war took place, the idea was not lost on General Lemnitzer But he and his colleagues were frustrated by Kennedy's failure to authorize their plan, and angry that Castro had not provided an excuse to invade.

The final straw may have come during a White House meeting on February 26, 1962. Concerned that General Lansdale's various covert action plans under Operation Mongoose were simply becoming more outrageous and going nowhere, Robert Kennedy told him to drop all anti-Castro efforts. Instead, Lansdale was ordered to concentrate for the next three months strictly on gathering intelligence about Cuba. It was a humiliating defeat for Lansdale, a man more accustomed to praise than to scorn.

As the Kennedy brothers appeared to suddenly "go soft" on Castro, Lemnitzer could see his opportunity to invade Cuba quickly slipping away. The attempts to provoke the Cuban public to revolt seemed dead and Castro, unfortunately, appeared to have no inclination to launch any attacks against Americans or their property Lemnitzer and the other Chiefs knew there was only one option left that would ensure their war. They would have to trick the American public and world opinion into hating Cuba so much that they would not only go along, but would insist that he and his generals launch their war against Castro. "World opinion, and the United Nations forum," said a secret JCS document, "should be favorably affected by developing the international image of the Cuban government as rash and irresponsible, and as an alarming and unpredictable threat to the peace of the Western Hemisphere."

Operation Northwoods called for a war in which many patriotic Americans and innocent Cubans would die senseless deaths, all to satisfy the egos of twisted generals back in Washington, safe in their taxpayer financed homes and limousines.

One idea seriously considered involved the launch of John Glenn, the first American to orbit the earth. On February 20,1962, Glenn was to lift off from Cape Canaveral, Florida, on his historic journey. The flight was to carry the banner of America's virtues of truth, freedom, and democracy into orbit high over the planet. But Lemnitzer and his Chiefs had a different idea. They proposed to Lansdale that, should the rocket explode and kill Glenn, "the objective is to provide irrevocable proof that . . . the fault lies with the Communists et al Cuba [sic.]"

This would be accomplished, Lemnitzer continued, "by manufacturing various pieces of evidence which would prove electronic interference on the part of the Cubans." Thus, as NASA prepared to send the first American into space, the Joint Chiefs of Staff were preparing to use John Glenn's possible death as a pretext to launch a war.

Glenn lifted into history without mishap, leaving Lemnitzer and the Chiefs to begin devising new plots which they suggested be carried out "within the time frame of the next few months."

Among the actions recommended was "a series of well coordinated incidents to take place in and around" the U.S. Navy base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. This included dressing "friendly" Cubans in Cuban military uniforms and then have them "start riots near the main gate of the base. Others would pretend to be saboteurs inside the base. Ammunition would be blown up, fires started, aircraft sabotaged, mortars fired at the base with damage to installations."

The suggested operations grew progressively more outrageous. Another called for an action similar to the infamous incident in February 1898 when an explosion aboard the battleship Maine in Havana harbor killed 266 U.S. sailors. Although the exact cause of the explosion remained undetermined, it sparked the Spanish-American War with Cuba. Incited by the deadly blast, more than one million men volunteered for duty. Lemnitzer and his generals came up with a similar plan. "We could blow up a U.S. ship in Guantanamo Bay and blame Cuba," they proposed; "casualty lists in U.S. newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national indignation."

There seemed no limit to their fanaticism: "We could develop a Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington," they wrote. "The terror campaign could be pointed at Cuban refugees seeking haven in the United States.

We could sink a boatload of Cubans en route to Florida (real or simulated). . . . We could foster attempts on lives of Cuban refugees in the United States even to the extent of wounding in instances to be widely publicized."

Bombings were proposed, false arrests, hijackings:

*"Exploding a few plastic bombs in carefully chosen spots, the arrest of Cuban agents and the release of prepared documents substantiating Cuban involvement also would be helpful in projecting the idea of an irresponsible government."

*"Advantage can be taken of the sensitivity of the Dominican [Republic] Air Force to intrusions within their national air space. 'Cuban' B-26 or C-46 type aircraft could make cane burning raids at night. Soviet Bloc incendiaries could be found. This could be coupled with 'Cuban' messages to the Communist underground in the Dominican Republic and 'Cuban' shipments of arms which would be found, or intercepted, on the beach. Use of MiG type aircraft by U.S. pilots could provide additional provocation."

*"Hijacking attempts against civil air and surface craft could appear to continue as harassing measures condoned by the Government of Cuba."

Among the most elaborate schemes was to "create an incident which will demonstrate convincingly that a Cuban aircraft has attacked and shot down a chartered civil airliner en route from the United States to Jamaica, Guatemala, Panama or Venezuela. The destination would be chosen only to cause the flight plan route to cross Cuba. The passengers could be a group of college students off on a holiday or any grouping of persons with a common interest to support chartering a non-scheduled flight."

Lemnitzer and the Joint Chiefs worked out a complex deception:

An aircraft at Elgin AFB would be painted and numbered as an exact duplicate for a civil registered aircraft belonging to a CJA proprietary organization in the Miami area. At a designated time the duplicate would be substituted for the actual civil aircraft and would be loaded with the selected passengers, all boarded under carefully prepared aliases. The actual registered aircraft would be converted to a drone [a remotely controlled unmanned aircraft]. Take off times of the drone aircraft and the actual aircraft will be scheduled to allow a rendezvous south of Florida.

From the rendezvous point the passenger-carrying aircraft will descend to minimum altitude and go directly into an auxiliary field at Elgin AFB where arrangements will have been made to evacuate the passengers and return the aircraft to its original status. The drone aircraft meanwhile will continue to fly the filed flight plan. When over Cuba the drone will be transmitting on the international distress frequency a "May Day" message stating he is under attack by Cuban MiG aircraft. The transmission will be interrupted by destruction of the aircraft, which will be triggered by radio signal. This will allow ICAO [International Civil Aviation Organization radio stations in the Western Hemisphere to tell the U.S. what has happened to the aircraft instead of the U.S. trying to "sell" the incident.

Finally, there was a plan to "make it appear that Communist Cuban MiGs have destroyed a USAF aircraft over international waters in an unprovoked attack." It was a particularly believable operation given the decade of shoot downs that had just taken place.

In the final sentence of his letter to Secretary McNamara recommending the operations, Lemnitzer made a grab for even more power asking that the Joint Chiefs be placed in charge of carrying out Operation Northwoods and the invasion. "It is recommended," he wrote, "that this responsibility for both oven and covert military operations be assigned to the Joint Chiefs of Staff."

At 2:30 on the afternoon of Tuesday, March 13, 1962, Lemnitzer went over last-minute details of Operation Northwoods with his covert action chief, Brigadier General William H. Craig, and signed the document. He then went to a "special meeting" in McNamara's office. An hour later he met with Kennedy's military representative, General Maxwell Taylor. What happened during those meetings is unknown. But three days later, President Kennedy told Lemnitzer that there was virtually no possibility that the U.S. would ever use overt military force in Cuba.

Undeterred, Lemnitzer and the Chiefs persisted, virtually to the point of demanding that they be given authority to invade and take over Cuba. About a month after submitting Operation Northwoods, they met the "tank," as the JCS conference room was called, and agreed on the wording of a tough memorandum to McNamara. "The Joint Chiefs of Staff believe that the Cuban problem must be solved in the near future," they wrote. "Further, they see no prospect of early success in overthrowing the present communist regime either as a result of internal uprising or external political, economic or psychological pressures. Accordingly they believe that military intervention by the United States will be required to overthrow the present communist regime."

Lemnitzer was virtually rabid in his hatred of Communism in general and Castro in particular "The Joint Chiefs of Staff believe that the United States can undertake military intervention in Cuba without risk of general war" he continued. "They also believe that the intervention can be accomplished rapidly enough to minimize communist opportunities for solicitation of UN action." However; what Lemnitzer was suggesting was not freeing the Cuban people, who were largely in support of Castro, but imprisoning them in a U.S. military-controlled police state. "Forces would assure rapid essential military control of Cuba," he wrote. "Continued police action would be required."

Concluding, Lemnitzer did not mince words: "[T]he Joint Chiefs of Staff recommend that a national policy of early military intervention in Cuba be adopted by the United States. They also recommend that such intervention be undertaken as soon as possible and preferably before the release of National Guard and Reserve forces presently on active duty."

By then McNamara had virtually no confidence in his military chief and was rejecting nearly every proposal the general sent to him. The rejections became so routine, said one of Lemnitzer's former staff officers, that the staffer told the general that the situation was putting the military in an "embarrassing rut." But Lemnitzer replied, "I am the senior military office--it's my job to state what I believe and it's his [McNamara's] job to approve or disapprove." "McNamara's arrogance was astonishing," said Lemnitzer's aide, who knew nothing of Operation Northwoods. "He gave General Lemnitzer very short shrift and treated him like a schoolboy. The general almost stood at attention when he came into the room. Everything was 'Yes, sir' and 'No, sir.'

Within months, Lemnitzer was denied a second term as JCS chairman and transferred to Europe as chief of NATO. Years later President Gerald Ford appointed Lemnitzer, a darling of the Republican right, to the President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board. Lemnitzer's Cuba chief, Brigadier General Craig, was also transferred. Promoted to major general, he spent three years as chief of the Army Security Agency, NSA's military arm.

Because of the secrecy and illegality of Operation Northwoods, all details remained hidden for forty years. Lemnitzer may have thought that all copies of the relevant documents had been destroyed; he was not one to leave compromising material lying around. Following the Bay of Pigs debacle, for example, he ordered Brigadier General David W Gray, Craig's predecessor as chief of the Cuba project within the JCS, to destroy all his notes concerning Joint Chiefs actions and discussions during that period. Gray's meticulous notes were the only detailed official records of what happened within the JCS during that time. According to Gray, Lemnitzer feared a congressional investigation and therefore wanted any incriminating evidence destroyed.

With the evidence destroyed, Lemnitzer felt free to lie to Congress. When asked, during secret hearings before a Senate committee, if he knew of any Pentagon plans for a direct invasion of Cuba he said he did not. Yet detailed JCS invasion plans had been drawn up even before Kennedy was inaugurated. And additional plans had been developed since. The consummate planner and man of details also became evasive, suddenly encountering great difficulty in recalling key aspects of the operation, as if he had been out of the country during the period. It was a sorry spectacle. Senator Gore called for Lemnitzer to be fired. "We need a shake up of the Joint Chiefs of Staff" he said. "We direly need a new chairman, as well as new members." No one had any idea of Operation Northwoods.

Because so many documents were destroyed, it is difficult to determine how many senior officials were aware of Operation Northwoods. As has been described, the document was signed and fully approved by Lemnitzer and the rest of the Joint Chiefs and addressed to the Secretary of Defense for his signature. Whether it went beyond McNamara to the president and the attorney general is not known.

Even after Lemnitzer lost his job, the Joint Chiefs kept planning "pretext" operations at least into 1963. Among their proposals was a deliberately create a war between Cuba and any of a number of .n American neighbors. This would give the United States military an excuse to come in on the side of Cuba's adversary and get rid of "A contrived 'Cuban' attack on an OAS [Organization of Americas] member could be set up," said one proposal, "and the attacked state could be urged to 'take measures of self-defense and request ice from the U.S. and OAS; the U.S. could almost certainly obtain necessary two-thirds support among OAS members for collective action against Cuba."

Among the nations they suggested that the United States secretly were Jamaica and Trinidad-Tobago. Both were members of the Commonwealth; thus, by secretly attacking them and then blaming Cuba, the United States could lure England into the war Castro. The report noted, "Any of the contrived situations de above are inherently, extremely risky in our democratic system in which security can be maintained, after the fact, with very great difficulty. If the decision should be made to set up a contrived situation it be one in which participation by U.S. personnel is limited only to the most highly trusted covert personnel. This suggests the infeasibility of the use of military units for any aspect of the contrived situation."

The report even suggested secretly paying someone in the Castro government to attack the United States: "The only area remaining for ration then would be to bribe one of Castro's subordinate commanders to initiate an attack on [the U.S. naval base at] Guantanamo." The act suggested--bribing a foreign nation to launch a violent attack American military installation--was treason.

In May 1963, Assistant Secretary of Defense Paul H. Nitze sent a the White House proposing "a possible scenario whereby an attack on a United States reconnaissance aircraft could be exploited toward the end of effecting the removal of the Castro regime." In the event Cuba attacked a U-2, the plan proposed sending in additional American pilots, this time on dangerous, unnecessary low-level reconnaissance missions with the expectation that they would also be shot down, thus provoking a war "[T]he U.S. could undertake various measures designed to stimulate the Cubans to provoke a new incident," said the plan. Nitze, however, did not volunteer to be one of the pilots.

One idea involved sending fighters across the island on "harassing reconnaissance" and "show-off" missions "flaunting our freedom of action, hoping to stir the Cuban military to action." "Thus," said the plan, "depending above all on whether the Cubans were or could be made to be trigger-happy, the development of the initial downing of a reconnaissance plane could lead at best to the elimination of Castro, perhaps to the removal of Soviet troops and the installation of ground inspection in Cuba, or at the least to our demonstration of firmness on reconnaissance." About a month later, a low-level flight was made across Cuba, but unfortunately for the Pentagon, instead of bullets it produced only a protest.

Lemnitzer was a dangerous-perhaps even unbalanced-right-wing extremist in an extraordinarily sensitive position during a critical period. But Operation Northwoods also had the support of every single member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and even senior Pentagon official Paul Nitze argued in favor of provoking a phony war with Cuba. The fact that the most senior members of all the services and the Pentagon could be so out of touch with reality and the meaning of democracy would be hidden for four decades.


In retrospect, the documents offer new insight into the thinking of the military's star-studded leadership. Although they never succeeded in launching America into a phony war with Cuba, they may have done so with Vietnam. More than 50,000 Americans and more than 2 million Vietnamese were eventually killed in that war.

It has long been suspected that the 1964 Gulf of Tonkin incident-the spark that led to America's long war in Vietnam-was largely staged or provoked by U.S. officials in order to build up congressional and public support for American involvement. Over the years, serious questions have been raised about the alleged attack by North Vietnamese patrol boats on two American destroyers in the Gulf But defenders of the Pentagon have always denied such charges, arguing that senior officials would never engage in such deceit.

Now, however, in light of the Operation Northwoods documents, it at deceiving the public and trumping up wars for Americans to fight and die in was standard, approved policy at the highest levels of the Pentagon. In fact, the Gulf of Tonkin seems right out of the Operation Northwoods playbook: "We could blow up a U.S. ship in Guantanamo Bay and blame Cuba . . . casualty lists in U.S. newspapers cause a helpful wave of indignation." One need only replace "Guantanamo Bay" with "Tonkin Gulf," and "Cuba" with "North Vietnam" and the Gulf of Tonkin incident may or may not have been stage-managed, but the senior Pentagon leadership at the time was clearly capable of such deceit.

By Thomas Retterbush


SOURCES & RESOURCES


Operation Northwoods - Proof US Government Could Harm Americans
http://rense.com/general18/harm.htm

Operation Northwoods: Justification for U.S. Military Intervention in Cuba
http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/Northwoods.html


Operation Northwoods Information Center
http://www.wanttoknow.info/010501operationnorthwoods


Book

BODY OF SECRETS, James Bamford, Doubleday, 2001, p.82 and following. Scanned and edited by NY Transfer News.

Book Epigram

"The public has a duty to watch its Government closely and keep it on the right track." --Lieutenant Gen. Kenneth A. Minihan, USAF, Director, NSA, _NSA Newsletter_, June 1997

Monday, July 29, 2013

Nikola Tesla: Destroyed by Elitists then Murdered by Hitler's Assassins?

Bankers Destroyed him to Stop His Free Energy and the Hitler's Assassins Murdered Him for Defecting to the West

Long ago, in 1884, a poor Serbian immigrant named Nikola Tesla arrived in the United States, at a time when America was still the land of opportunity...

Nikola may have been poor, but his ideas were destined to light up the entire world. It was Nikola Tesla, who invented alternating current, aka electric power. But that's only what the world remembers. He invented so much more. He was one of greatest scientists in history.

Brilliance of mind, ideas beyond our time, only Leonardo da Vinci could have held a candle to Nikola Tesla. He was not only an electrical genius, he was into mysticism, x-rays, photographing thoughts, resonating planet Earth, vedic philosophy and much, much more. Tesla invented or developed a significant number of electrical and electronic devices which were decades ahead of their time and would have been of special interest to US military and intelligence circles. Around 300 patents were issued to Tesla in 25 countries, many of them major and far-reaching in concept.

Contemporary biographers of Tesla have deemed him “the father of physics”, “the man who invented the twentieth century”, and “the patron saint of modern electricity”.

If society had followed up on the inventions Nikola Tesla envisioned at the turn of the century we wouldn't have a fossil-fuel economy today. And J. P. Morgan, Rockefeller and a number of others wouldn't have amassed extraordinary fortunes on the basis of that fossil fuel economy.

Many of Tesla’s patents fell into Nazi hands prior to and during World Wars I and II. As a result, Tesla continuously found himself in litigation over patent rights and other issues.

The Morgan-Rockefeller Influence 

In the early 1900s Morgan solidified control of the United States by eliminating competition with the creation of corporations, and then placing his trusted men in charge of those corporations or as members of its board of directors. Both Rockefeller and Morgan worked together to 'monopolize' the growing industrialized United States (Westinghouse, General Electric, U. S. Steel and similar Gigantic 'Trusts') during the early 1905 period (Truth About the Trusts: Book) Morgan considered himself a 'merchant' banker (commerce), but today he is known as the 'Investment' banker who became the 'central' banker for the United States. This is significant because Morgan's plans and goals ultimately became the political agenda for the United States.

Tesla was considered a loose cannon and was significantly controlled; both his early laboratories were destroyed in NYC by arson, with their many 'novelty of fact' inventions now lost to oblivion. Morgan ultimately 'controlled' Tesla and prevented him from fulfilling his life's dream of providing 'free energy' for the entire planet. Tesla's goals contradicted Morgan's and ultimately Tesla was short-circuited. We now know that Tesla was finally murdered to prevent him from passing on his dream of providing 'free energy.'


The Deliberate Curtailment of Nikola Tesla's Primary Energy Source 

J. P. Morgan upon discovering Tesla’s intent to establish freely derived ‘energy’ from basic sources (earth, wind, water, space-time) decided to effectively ‘control’ Tesla completely. He demanded fifty-one (51%) of Tesla’s Wardencliffe Project before he provided him the money for the Shoreham, Long Island Project. When Marconi preempted Tesla, by transmitting the letter "S" via shortwave, Morgan’s suspicions were aroused and he knew instantly that Tesla’s true intent, was much more than mere transmission of ‘voice’ and recognizable ‘signals.’ Tesla actually intended to provide much, much more, including the transmission of ‘energy,’ ‘information’ (data, visual, telemetry) and to transmit all of this worldwide, without the benefaction and fealty obligation to the investment bankers (such as Morgan). Tesla’s heart was within the United States, but his soul originated in Europe, thus his aspiration was to benefit the entire planet. Morgan curtailed Tesla once and for all time, by first stopping Tesla cold. He provided no more money for any more of Tesla’s research or experiments. Morgan controlled most of the newspapers, and the corporations that ran them, effectively silencing Tesla’s pronouncements. With the severance of Tesla’s purse, and the silencing of Tesla’s pronouncements, Morgan effectively curtailed Tesla, once and for all. Tesla’s life effectively stopped, it wasn’t long before Tesla became a faint memory, an after-thought and finally obscuration and ultimately ‘historical’ obliteration.

The diabolical nature of the suppression of Tesla extends further, directly to Westinghouse. George Westinghouse who was a friend as well as a benefactor of Nikola Tesla, apparently was a victim of J. P. Morgan’s goal of total economic control over ALL energy creation. The following ‘smoking gun’ provides an eerie introduction regarding Westinghouse’s own suppression as well. Morgan was determined to destroy George Westinghouse for his audacity to support Tesla, and he did accomplish that by creating the panic of 1907, which ultimately unseated Westinghouse from his own company, destroying his life. Excerpt: "After he turned 60, Westinghouse's world started to unravel."

During the financial panic of 1907, the Westinghouse Company was caught in a takeover bid from financier J.P. Morgan. Westinghouse's company was financially weakened, and he had to rescind on the royalty contract he had signed with Tesla. Westinghouse explained that his company would not survive if it had to pay Tesla his full royalties, so he persuaded Tesla to accept a buyout of his patents for $216,000. This was much less than the $12 million the patents were worth at the time. 

Tesla’s Murder

Tesla’s murder came to light when Eric Bermen told Greg Syzmanski how he discovered his former girlfriend was the daughter of ex-Nazi SS Commando Otto Skorzeny, and thereby quite by chance met the elderly Skorzeny who had been living for years in the US, working as a carpenter with a new identity supplied by the CIA after WWII.

Bermen, aka Eric Orion, heard a full confession from Skorzeny, who was dying and was given a shoebox full of over a hundred photographs to substantiate his claims.
Among a number of other highly significant revelations, Bermen heard from Skorzeny that he had personally suffocated the 86 year old Nikola Tesla on January 6, 1943, assisted by fellow-Nazi Reinhard Gehlen. .
Skorzeny said, he and Gehlen had tricked Tesla the previous day into revealing the full details of his most important discoveries. After the murder, they stole the contents of Tesla’s safe, which were delivered to Hitler. Of course, the US military fully repatriated this priceless innovative information through Project Paperclip at the end of the war.

All of Tesla's papers were confiscated by the FBI after his death! 

As Tesla approached his final years, most of his close friends and benefactors were dead. The man who had electrified the planet was almost forgotten by the world....Most of his last days were spent feeding the pigeons in Bryant Park, in front of the public library on Fifth Ave.

The great discoverer of electricity met the Creator of electricity on Jan. 7, 1943.

On Good Friday, Ortodox Christmas Eve, he was found in bed, dressed in solemn black suit, arms folded on his chest. They say that a great mind felt his death is coming , he put on the solemn black suit – and then died. An incredible lie and mission impossible, even for a great mind as it was Nikola Tesla.
 
Efforts Westinghouse made to save his business failed, and soon he lost most of his control over his industrial empire. The failure destroyed him. George Westinghouse died a few years later in 1914 in New York City at the age of 69."

Others quickly intercepted Tesla’s ideas, and simply ran with them, developing their own ‘niche’ within the technologically developing age of the Morgan-Rockefeller influence. Once in a while these ‘niche’ developments would be challenged by other challengers and effectively stopped in the courts and at the patent office, when Tesla’s priority of art, was recognized by the examiners and the courts. Morgan hadn’t been able to control the government of the United States and its patent office, whose public servants still performed their duty effectively and faithfully, but he was hell-bent on accomplishing just that. 
Energy is perhaps the greatest investment strategy in the financial fabric of this planet. Regulation of energy and energy related products drives the world's economy.

International bankers deliberately sandbagged, and then ultimately disrupted the flow of oil to the lower forty-eight states, sending that oil to Asia and the Pacific thus artificially inflating the price of oil in America. We could build more refineries, but our government deliberately prevents such construction, thereby keeping the price of actual fuel purchase artificially higher than it needs to be. In short the United States could be ‘energy’ independent in both coal and oil production alone, not needing to participate in the outside international community. We could be isolationist and independent of world considerations, and we would not need to wage wars for our economic survival.

We also know that industries built and developed within the United States by American firms, were duplicated and enlarged within Russia (and currently China) during the Russian revolution, cold war, and that the actual US Treasury plates of the American Dollar were given to the Russians so that they could print the actual dollars necessary to purchase American goods and services (see, "Lifting The Curtain On The Invisible Government", here: http://bit.ly/1aPeIhS). We also know that each time these communist nations were helped and enlarged, the American people ultimately suffered and were cheated out of their wealth and savings.

Current world’s crises is mostly spinning around following issues: high oil prices, food shortage, environmental issues, earthquakes on financial markets, huge difference between developed and underdeveloped countries… They are very much connected but where are the roots? Would it be possible to have different world as we have it now?

It’s hypothetical, but less greed at the beginning of 20th century would tremendously change the part of our civilisation. All needed tools were there but in the name of personal power and prestige they were cut for world citizens. The sins and the sinners, how ironically, are the same as they were a 100 years ago.

The United States has been nothing more than an 'economic' cow, that has been milked for the pleasure and profit of a few 'investment' bankers and their associates, secret societies and revolutionaries. The U.S. is being forced to provide the 'capital' and 'resources' enabling these international bankers to establish their agenda both domestically and internationally.

Under names like Globalization, New World Order, Agenda 21, as well as others, these international bankers are to ultimately do away with national sovereignty, by eliminating the independent currencies of the western nations They already succeeded in Europe with the establishment of the Euro, and presently, the attempted destruction of the dollar and the imposition of the Amero upon the nations of Canada, U.S., Mexico and South America. 

We must not let this happen. It would be a major nail in the coffin of national sovereignty and freedom, right up there with their planned gun grab, wealth redistribution and Sustainable Development.

We must demand they release the clean, free energy sources invented by Tesla and other brilliant scientists to change our ways, before we destroy our planet. Free energy alone would change Earth more than you would ever have believed possible. Think about it!

By Tom Retterbush


SOURCES & RESOURCES

Nikola Tesla—The Man Who Electrified The World!

Tesla's Controversial Life and Death
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/supressed_inventions/suppressed_inventions36.htm

Nikola Tesla was Murdered by Otto Skorzeny
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/02/13/nikola-tesla-was-murdered-by-otto-skorzeny

Wednesday, July 24, 2013

Snopes the Debunking Site Debunked as Fraud

Snopes, the popular debunking site just got Snoped, or, should I say, debunked. Snopes.com has been considered the 'tell-all final word' on any claim, turns out to be run by a man and a woman with no background in investigation using Google! 

Once, any negative article by them and people would point and say, "See, I told you it wasn't true!" But what is Snopes? What are their methods and training that gives them the authority to decide what is true and what is not? 

For several years people have tried to find out who exactly was behind the website Snopes.com. Only recently did they get to the bottom of it. Are you ready for this? It is run by a husband and wife team - that's right, no big office of investigators scouring public records in Washington, no researchers studying historical stacks in libraries, no team of lawyers reaching a consensus on current caselaw. No, Snopes.com is just a mom-and-pop operation that was started by two people who have absolutely no formal background or experience in investigative research. 

For the past few years www.snopes.com has positioned itself, or  others have  labeled it, as the 'tell all final word' on any comment, claim and email.   But for several years people tried to find out who exactly was behind Snopes.  Only recently  did Wikipedia get to the bottom of it - kinda  makes you wonder what they were hiding.  Well, finally we know. It  is run  by a husband and wife team - that's right, no big office of investigators  and researchers, no team of lawyers.  It's just a small-time husband and wife operation run from their kitchen table. You or I could do the exact same thing from our smartphones!

Starting as a hobby, David and Barbara Mikkelson in the San Fernando Valley of California launched  the Website about 13 years ago. They have no formal background  or  experience in investigative research at all, period.  Though after a few years of gaining  popularity, considering they were believed by all to be unbiased and neutral, after a while people started asking questions who was behind it and did they have  a an alternative agenda?  The reason for the raised skepticism was Snopes claiming to have the bottom line to  certain  questions when in fact they had been proven wrong.  Also,  there  were criticism the Mikkelsons were not  really investigating and getting to  the real bottom of  things on various issues. 

A little while back, when the State Farm agent Bud Gregg in Mandeville hoisted a  political sign referencing Barack Obama and made a big splash across  the  internet, 'supposedly' the Mikkelson's claim to have researched  this issue  before posting their findings on Snopes.  In their statement  they  claimed the corporate office of State Farm pressured Gregg into  taking down  the sign, when in fact nothing of the sort 'ever' took place. In fact, no  one from Snopes ever contacted anyone with State Farm.  Yet, Snopes  issued a statement as the 'final factual word' on the issue as if  they did  all their homework and got to the bottom of things - not!

Then it has been learned the Mikkelson's are jewish - very  Democratic and extremely liberal. There has been much criticism lately over the  internet  with people pointing out the Mikkelson's liberalism revealing itself  in  their website findings.

I suggest anyone who goes to www..snopes.com to get what they think to be the bottom line to 'proceed with extreme caution.'  Take it at face value, nothing more, nothing less.  Use it only to lead you to their  references where you can link to and read the sources for yourself.  You are always better off Googling a subject yourself. When you do the research yourself, you get to know more sources you can come back to for other issues as well. 

I have included a list of proven, time-tested debunking sites you may want to check out. Though you never want to rely entirely on the evidence of a debunking site,they are a good place to start an investigation.




By Tom Retterbush



RESOURCES

Top sites to debunk Internet hoaxes & urban legends
Hoaxbusters- The site has been around a long time (since 1995) and has a good archive but doesn’t seem to be as current as it once was. It is a part of the US Department of Energy - Computer Incident Advisory Capacity (CAIC). Chances are that if you cannot find details of a hoax on one of the other sites, you may be able to find it here. Because it has been around so long there are some dead links. Hoaxbusters also contains a page of links to other hoax sites.
http://hoaxbusters.ciac.org/

TruthOrFiction.com excellent site from Rich Buhler.
http://www.truthorfiction.com/


About Urban Legends- This about.com subsite has been hosted for ten years by David Emery and frankly, he has done a great job. He is passionate about finding and debunking all those rumors, myths, pranks and odd stories. I have found lately that I am referring more people to his site than Snopes because I like the format better. The site also shows up in more Google searches than the others indicating that the content is well linked and used.
http://urbanlegends.about.com/

Break The Chain- In 1999, John Ratliff was annoyed that he kept receiving the same chain spams forwarded to him over and over. I have been just as annoyed for just as long but he did something about it. Like most of these sites, John has plenty of healthy advertisements but no pop-ups. His site is getting more professional looking all the time. He is also frequently cited by the media when looking for an authoritative source on these stupid chain mails.
http://www.breakthechain.org/

Sophos - This anti-virus company keeps a small list of hoaxes and urban legends but it is not nearly as complete as the sites at the top of this list. Their focus is more on virus hoaxes -you know, the ones that scream that you will wipe your hard drive and melt the motherboard if you open the suspect e-mail.
http://www.sophos.com/security/hoaxes/

F-Secure - They claim that their list is comprehensive and the industry standard source for all things hoax related. Don’t believe it. If you click on their list of latest hoaxes you’ll see that it hasn’t been updated for a few years. However, it is still a good list to search if you don’t find what you’re looking for elsewhere.
http://www.f-secure.com/virus-info/hoax/

VMyths- Well referenced by specialists in the computer security field, VMyths takes Internet hoaxes and chain letters to a new level. If you want to read what the real experts have to say about Internet hoaxes, virus scares, myths and legends, get it from Rob Rosenberger at VMyths. Unfortunately, their lists are not comprehensive.
http://www.vmyths.com/

Symantec- I have a love-hate affair with Symantec. I use their products but I’ve been burned by them several times lately. That’s a story for another post. Their hoax list is pretty good but seems a little dated. Maybe that’s because most hoaxes today are really recycled from earlier hoaxes.
http://www.symantec.com/business/security_response/threatexplorer/risks/hoaxes.jsp

Trend Micro - They have improved their list lately with some good updates. I like their style and formatting. Obviously a company that sells AV solutions has a vested interest in keeping their hoax list up to date. Check out their complete list of urban legends. It has some entries that I have not seen elsewhere.
http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/hoaxes/

Virus Busters - A short list from the University of Michigan of hoaxes and legends that keep coming back. Like the UofM, I have not seen a lot of new hoaxes lately - they are almost all repackaged oldies. The list is not intended to be comprehensive but is a good reference point for what you will see on a regular basis.
http://virusbusters.itcs.umich.edu/hoaxes.html

I know I’ve missed some of your favorite sites and would like to hear about them. Add yours to the comments so we can all increase our knowledge of what’s out there.




SOURCES

Debunking snopes.com

Snopes NO MORE The Self-proclaimed Debunker Of Urban Legend has been debunked

Tuesday, July 23, 2013

Cover-up: Fukushima Killer Radiation Reaches U.S.

If you live on America’s West Coast or Canada, you may want to assess your water supply, consider how you select your food and be careful how you prepare your dinner. Due to the long half-life of radiation, the whole ecosystem of the U.S. West Coast will be contaminated for the next 16 million years!

The Japanese and U.S. governments have covered up the severity of the Fukushima accident from the start. Indeed, the EPA reacted to Fukushima by even raising “acceptable” radiation levels.

Any increase in disease or death resulting from these continued radiation spikes will more than likely be blamed on causes other than radiation, effectively covering up the severity of the situation. The radiation component of radiation-induced heart disease, organ failure, and cancer, for example, will be simply ignored, and any increase in deaths, particularly among the elderly, declared nothing unusual.

The New York Academy of Medicine’s Fukushima Symposium makes crystal clear that there has been a deliberate effort by Japanese government, the Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO), the Obama administration, the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) to downplay the long term health consequences of nuclear fallout, especially to children. Instead of backtracking on the billions of dollars he approved to subsidize TEPCO to build more US nuclear power plants, Obama is participating in an international cover-up to conceal the serious long term dangers of this technology.

However, Americans apparently aren't quite as ignorant as our government might have hoped, considering a recent Rasmussen Report found more than one-third of all Americans believing radiation from Fukushima caused "significant harm" in the U.S. This is likely due to the fact that high levels of radiation were observed in soil, water, and even food all across America in the wake of the disaster. 

After visiting Fukushima recently, Senator Ron Wyden said that the Fukushima fuel pool is a national security issue for AMERICA. He warned that the situation was worse than reported… 

The Japan Times: “Fears marine life is being poisoned’ by nuclear material flowing from Fukushima — Experts warn of ‘festering radioactive sore’ contaminating food chain...”

The International Journal of Health Services alleges that 14,000 people have already died in the United States due to Fukushima!

Though the authors seem to have pretty solid credentials, Scientific American blog post and Med Page Today slam the study as being voodoo science, but admit: “Certainly radiation from Fukushima is dangerous, and could very well lead to negative health effects—even across the Pacific.”

The fancy little picture above is a dramatization showing you the flow of radiation from the Fukushima nuclear plant. Yes, that sharp pain you just felt in your chest is the sudden realization that the image shows the radiation reaching America.

Nuclear expert Helen Caldicott called Fukushima "an unprecedented absolute disaster, multiples worse than Chernobyl. The situation is very grim and not just for the Japanese people.

Fukushima's have been operating for 40 years, and would hold about 30 times more radiation than Chernobyl.

Chernobyl killed nearly one million people and counting, according to the New York Academy of Sciences. Many deaths will never be included in the official count, because their cancers won't be connected to Chernobyl. The long term impact of a compromised immune system and the subsequent health challenges will never be officially traced to Chernobyl.

Like Chernobyl, the accident at Fukushima is of global proportions. Unusual levels of radiation have been discovered in British Columbia, along the West Coast and East Coast of the United States and in Europe, and heavy contamination has been found in oceanic waters.

Nuclear engineer Gunderson says that we’ll see a statistically meaningful increase in cancer on the West Coast of America and
Canada from Fukushima. There is certainly evidence that West Coast residents – especially in Seattle, Portland and other areas near the Cascades –  have been hit with some radiation. And there is certainly evidence that radioactive contamination has spread in the United States, and will continue to spread for some time to come.

Once they are ingested, inhaled, or enter your body through a cut, their grotesque potent force cuts through your body like knife through butter, into the cells, blood or other organs, impacting other organs and leaving behind hideous, shocking damage.

A single alpha particle from Plutonium, Uranium, Americium or Radon can deliver a huge blast of radiation inside your body.  This radiation energy can destroy your genetic material at a cellular level.


Some people are more susceptible than others:

   *  Those who are already sick
   *  Those who have weak immune systems
   *  The elderly
   *  Children, babies & the unborn 

Once radiation is released into the environment it circulates and is carried with the winds until it become part of the soil and food chain.  It ends up in our drinking water, on the pastures that our livestock graze on, on our vegetables and in our fruit trees.



This is particularly dangerous for humans because we are at the top of the food chain, where the higher concentrations of radionuclides are.

Most Common Diseases From Ionizing Radiation:

   *  leukemia
   *  lymphoma
   *  solid tumors or any organ
   *  bone & blood disorders
   *  lung cancer
   *  breast cancer
   *  endocrine disruption
   *  reproductive abnormalities
   *  accelerated aging process
   *  birth defects
   *  congenital malformations
   *  kidney, liver damage

These diseases and mutations don't stop with us.  If ionizing radiation enters our genes, not only does it cause irreversible damage to this generation, but to future generations, as evidenced by children being born years after Chernobyl.

This isn’t a conspiracy theory, this is happening and it’s happening right now!

But before packing up and relocating to Antarctica, a few options are available that can drastically reduce exposure to these harmful elements.

Protect and detoxify

Here are several precautions that can help shield individuals from a radioactive food supply:

- View all fish and crustaceans from the Pacific Ocean as tainted.
- Always use filtered water for cooking and drinking.
- Pay attention to the origin of dairy.
- Wash any produce thoroughly with natural soap and rinse with purified water.
- Avoid meat from contaminated regions (including wild game).

Another level of defense is explained in the article, Remove radiation from your produce with Calcium Bentonite Clay:

"You can add Calcium Bentonite Clay to your milk and drinking water if you're concerned about the possibility of contamination there as well. Add approximately 1 ounce of liquid Calcium Bentonite Clay to a gallon of organic raw milk or water. Some people prefer to let the clay settle to the bottom of the liquid and discard that portion, while others prefer to shake it up and drink them together. Either is fine."

All in all, it truly is a sad state of affairs when the idea of donning a hazmat suit simply to handle our food is not as outrageous as it once had been.

Maybe now you will consider checking out our SurvivalWatch Facebook Page, where I will be covering this and related survival topics more thoroughly in the next few days. You may want to check out my new
Surviving Radiation Facebook post on SurvivalWatch, here: http://on.fb.me/18B2MTn

~ Tom Retterbush


SOURCES & RESOURCES

Articles

Hello World! OPEN LETTER TO WHOM FUKUSHIMA MAY CONCERN

The Continuing Fukushima Cover-Up

Fukushima radiation update

Fukushima Reactor Disaster Archive 1

Fukushima Reactor Disaster Archive 2

Japan Times: ‘Fears marine life is being poisoned’ by nuclear material flowing from Fukushima — Experts warn of ‘festering radioactive sore’ contaminating food chain — Tepco flip-flop ‘shocking’

Video

Radioactive Fish, Pacific Ocean, Fukushima Leaking MORE Radiation

Links

Wednesday, July 17, 2013

Are we Headed for a Violent Race War?

We have a much bigger fight to fight my friends, but we are being fooled by a sideshow designed to distract and divide us, the people.

Immediately after the verdict in the case of Trayvon Martin was announced, people took to their social networks to express either outrage with the decision.

Trayvon Martin supporters on Twitter have taken their anger over the acquittal of George Zimmerman to a new level, calling for the neighborhood watch volunteer to be beheaded, Pundit Press said Tuesday.

“[J]ustice no peace so get up off my street behead zimmerman (sic),” one person said.
“Behead Zimmerman, put that sh*t in a box and send it to his mother,” VeSun tweeted.

“WE WANT ZIMMERMAN DEAD OR ALIVE!! LET’S MAKE HIM AN EXAMPLE TO ‘AMERICA’ AND BEHEAD HIM LIVE ON THE NET,”screamed another Twitter user.

“Behead Zimmerman & make it ya new avi so I know it’s real,” demanded ”yeenfreshazimiz.” “Can we just behead Zimmerman in the national mall?? He’s clearly not guilty of doing ANYthing morally correct,” said ”TRA”

“Kill Zimmerman and anybody who supports him… And decapitate his lawyer,” said ”Tyrell McLean.”

“George Zimmerman’s brother should get chipped first behead the dude and send it priority mail to Zimmerman’s front door step,” suggested ”Chris Gonzo.”

A post at Fire Andrea Mitchell dated May 18, 2012 said Twitter has allowed an account named@BeheadZimmerman to exist. That account remains on Twitter, but has not been active since June 2012.

Since the case made national news last year, Twitter users — dubbed the “Twitter lynch mob” by Twitchy – have repeatedly called for Zimmerman’s murder.

Since Saturday’s acquittal, the “Twitter lynch mob” has targeted Zimmerman, his wife, attorney and the jurors on the case with death threats that clearly violate Twitter’s rules.

“You may not publish or post direct, specific threats of violence against others,” Twitter says, although the site appears to be quite lax in enforcing those rules against users who have issued threats against Zimmerman.

People forget that, contrary to predominant leftist opinion, the Trayvon Martin case had little to do with race, and it was ultimately decided on its legal merits. Yet, the lie is constantly fed and continues to grow. It seems clear enough that the media, the powers-that-be and the willfully ignorant all have one thing in common. They want a race war. Keeping America divided along racial and political lines prevents us from coming together and directing our rage toward the real culprits behind the true injustices in our society. 

Personally, I don't believe Zimmerman to be a racist, but regardless if he is or isn't, this trial should have never had anything to do with race whatsoever. Zimmerman is not white, he is a Latino with black heritage, black foster siblings, dated a black woman in high school, had a black business partner, voted for Obama, and even went to jail sticking up for a black homeless man being beat up by police. Yet somehow the focus of this trial has swirled around race, rather then the facts of the case.

Whatever you choose to believe about the case, whether he was justified in shooting Trayvon Martin or whether you believe he was actually attacked, this all boils down to one relatively minor incident in the overall scheme of things in this country. 

This is not to belittle the suffering of Travon’s family and friends, or even the hardships of those in the Zimmerman camp, but really, at the end of the day, this is one of thousands upon thousands of incidents that happen in this country every day. There is nothing particularly outstanding about this case, which is why the race-card has been pulled, to make it out to be much more than it ever really was.

Nevertheless, there is outrage over the incident and the acquittal, as misplaced as it really is. The country has hardly ever been more divided. But I ask you, where is the rage when it comes to the real issues? The issues that set precedent for us all? Where is the outrage against clear, unequivocal miscarriages of justices and government abuse of we the people? We the people, of all color and political ideals. We the the overwhelming majority.

Where is the outrage over the fact that Federal authorities stormed a whole town, and ripped American citizens out of their own homes at gunpoint, house to house, like the Gestapo, without a warrant? Personally, I think this is certainly more deserving of rioting in the streets.

Where is the outrage over the fact that Federal authorities  are spying on us without warrants or even probable cause? Where is the outrage over the not federal Federal Reserve, printing money instead of doing what is necessary to save this country from certain economic collapse?  Where is the outrage over a President who disrespects and disregards the Constitution, bypasses Congress with Executive Orders whenever he feels like it and orders drone missiles to kill people living in countries that are supposed to be our friends. And these are just a few of the many real reasons we have to be pissed off and protest about. 

King Samir Shabazz
Those who want to divide us have been doing a good job, now having The New Black Panther Party engaged in violent, racist, hate filled speech.

“You want freedom? You’re gonna have to kill some crackers! You’re gonna have to kill some of their babies!” Those were the words of Minister King Samir Shabazz, also known as Maurice Heath, the New Black Panther Party’s Philadelphia leader.

Shabazz is the same man the Obama administration Department of Justice refused to prosecute after he was filmed on Election Day 2008 with Jerry Jackson wearing paramilitary uniforms, carrying a nightstick and blocking a doorway to a polling location to intimidate voters.

Although the original Black Panther Party, called the Black Panther Party for Self-Defense, was a controversial civil rights and self-defense organization active within the United States in the 1960s and 1970s, members of the original Black Panther Party do not recognize the new party," which was formed in Dallas in 1989. 

Further investigation by Conspiracy Watch into the New Black Panther Party (see my article, New Black Panther Party Instigating Race War of Hate, Violence and Death to White Devils) has revealed some troubling information. Apparently some high ranking Washington officials, including  Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and Harvard Professor Henry Louis Gates all have long standing close associations with dubious figures in the black underground movement of the original Black Panthers, the New Black Panthers, the Weathermen, the Nation of Islam, the Black Muslims, even Hezbollah and Hamas.
 
These associations first came to the surface during my research for the article, The Corruption of President Barack Obama, where I first reported to you the relationship between Barack Obama and dangerous militants, particularly the infamous extremist, Derrick Bell. It was during this investigation that I also looked into the background of Eric Holder, Hillary Clinton, Professor Gates and Eldridge Cleaver, as well as others involved in the left wing’s Dark Side, including Malik Shabazz, H. Rap Brown, Abdul Alim Musa, Khalid Abdul Muhammad, Carlos Torres, and Marilyn Buck.
 
Obama with New Black Panthers
The Dark Side gets even darker, when we uncover that Torres and Buck were just released from federal prison, when the Obama appointed Attorney General Eric Holder quietly set in motion a policy to free terrorists, with that insuring the release of Marilyn Buck.

Buck had been a member of the Weathermen, an Americanradical left organization characterized by Black separatist rhetoric, along with Obama associates Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn, and had participated in homegrown terror during the 1960s and 70s. She had also maintained membership in the Black Liberation Army and the Black Panthers. She had been serving an 80-year sentence, and her full sentence would have kept her incarcerated until Jan. 31, 2061. What reasons could the DOJ have had to release Buck from prison?

It is believed by some, that Buck’s affiliation with friends of Barack Obama gave Holder the incentive for early release.

Obama’s longtime pastor, Jeremiah Wright printed a Hamas manifesto in Trinity United Church of Christ’s Sunday bulletin, showing that there are those running our country who are sympathetic to Islamic jihad.

A new investigation by Congressman Peter King, R-NY revealed New Black Panther ties to the Middle East terrorist group Hezbollah. King, who has been investigating Hezbollah's activities within the US as part of a probe into domestic terrorism, is the House Committee Chairman on Homeland Security. As if to confirm King’s claims, a researcher who works with retired General Paul Vallely, issued a separate report exposing significant collaboration between Hezbollah and the New Black Panthers. 

Most, if not all of The New Black Panthers are Muslims, and most are ex-cons. 

Directing their Hate at the Wrong People

No matter how hard I try, I cannot understand why The New Black Panthers have such hate for America and white people.

As a white man, I have long been saying, many black and Hispanic people are just as, if not more racist than whites. Many of these violent, hate-filled, racist people of color blame on white people what they should be blaming on rich people.

As a so-called Caucasian man born and raised in small-town Germany where there were no black or Hispanic people, I was not raised racist because I didn’t know anyone but those of my own race. I couldn't hate anybody but "my own kind". Growing up, to me people were people.

When I moved to Cincinnati, Ohio, a city in the United States with a very high black population, I was very naive to racism, but I soon found out that many black people hated me.

They seemed to blame me for slavery that happened to them hundreds of years ago. They seemed to blame me for the economic conditions of America, the unjust laws of the courts and the ignorance of their children.

In fact, there have been many situations where I was discriminated against as a white man. Or should I call myself a German-American? If I had, maybe I would not have been discriminated against by black or Hispanic people for being white in their neighborhood or establishment and several times where I was discriminated against by white people, because affirmative action demanded someone of different ethnicity get the position or treatment. Yes, average white people get treated unfairly because of their color all the time. In fact, I bet just as often as blacks and Hispanics!  

I did not enslave anybody. I did keep anybody poor, send anybody to jail or keep anybody from paying attention in school. I am living in a tiny apartment, just as poor as the black folks of the ghetto. I was railroaded and sent to prison for a small amount of marijuana. I dropped out of high school. The cops have beat me up just as they would a black man, and would just as soon shoot me.

I am in no better or worse shape than the average black or Hispanic man.

I ask the folks of color to stop hating those who are not responsible for their troubles. There are many white folks in the same boat as you. Blame those who really are responsible for the unfair conditions in America; primarily the rich bankers and corporations in cahoots with corrupt politicians. Blame the members of the Illuminati, trying to bring us into a New World Order. Sure, some of them are white, some are Jewish, but none have anything in common with regular white folks the New Black Panther's are wanting to kill.

Although Bill Cosby tells CNN Trayvon Martin: His death more about guns than race, I don’t think this started as a race thing. The New Black Panther Party has turned it into a race thing, using it as an excuse to spread their message of hate.

They declare war on capitalism, but are quick to take donations, failing to realize that this makes them capitalists themselves. If so down on capitalism, why did the original Black Panthers embezzle millions of dollars in California education funds? It seems they believe money only to be bad when it belongs to someone else.

They blame the white man for all their troubles, either failing to realize or not caring that there are hundreds or thousands of white people in the exact same boat as they are.

RiPPa, the creator, publisher, and editor-in-chief of TheIntersection of Madness & Reality writes, “the New Black Panther Party are a ridiculous ragtag bunch who has nothing substantive to offer the black community or society at large.”

You go, RiPPa!

What this debacle has shown me, is that we Americans have become so lazy and content with our little lives, that even things that piss us off won't get us off the couch. Indeed, we have been down this exact road before and nothing has changed. Back in the 60's there were race-riots similar to those of today. Then again after the Rodney King incident. Yet all that rioting, all those broken store-front windows, all those burned out cars didn't change anything.

Those responsible still rule. Those who instigated these riots through media manipulation are sitting back watching the violence in TV while counting their billions.

Before anything can change, the people must recognize the real enemy.

Written By: Tom Retterbush

Featured Post

Obama and The New World Order

The Elitist Puppet- Masters needed a Charismatic, Likeable and Photogenic President to Replace a Disgraced and Dishonored Bush to win bac...