If you live on America’s West Coast or Canada, you may want to assess your water supply, consider how you select your food and be careful how you prepare your dinner. Due to the long half-life of radiation, the whole ecosystem of the U.S. West Coast will be contaminated for the next 16 million years!
The Japanese and U.S. governments have covered up the severity of the Fukushima accident from the start. Indeed, the EPA reacted to Fukushima by even raising “acceptable” radiation levels.
Any increase in disease or death resulting from these continued radiation spikes will more than likely be blamed on causes other than radiation, effectively covering up the severity of the situation. The radiation component of radiation-induced heart disease, organ failure, and cancer, for example, will be simply ignored, and any increase in deaths, particularly among the elderly, declared nothing unusual.
The New York Academy of Medicine’s Fukushima Symposium makes
crystal clear that there has been a deliberate effort by Japanese government,
the Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO), the Obama administration, the World
Health Organization (WHO) and the Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP)
to downplay the long term health consequences of nuclear fallout, especially to
children. Instead of backtracking on the billions of dollars he approved
to subsidize TEPCO to build more US
nuclear power plants, Obama is participating in an international cover-up to
conceal the serious long term dangers of this technology.
However, Americans apparently aren't quite as ignorant as our government might have hoped, considering a recent Rasmussen Report found more than one-third of all Americans believing radiation from Fukushima caused "significant harm" in the U.S. This is likely due to the fact that high levels of radiation were observed in soil, water, and even food all across America in the wake of the disaster.
However, Americans apparently aren't quite as ignorant as our government might have hoped, considering a recent Rasmussen Report found more than one-third of all Americans believing radiation from Fukushima caused "significant harm" in the U.S. This is likely due to the fact that high levels of radiation were observed in soil, water, and even food all across America in the wake of the disaster.
After visiting Fukushima
recently, Senator Ron Wyden said that the Fukushima
fuel pool is a national security issue for AMERICA.
He warned that the situation was worse than reported…
The Japan
Times: “Fears marine life is being poisoned’ by nuclear material flowing from Fukushima
— Experts warn of ‘festering radioactive sore’ contaminating food chain...”
The International
Journal of Health Services alleges that 14,000 people have already died in the United States due to Fukushima!
Though the authors
seem to have pretty solid credentials, Scientific American blog post and Med
Page Today slam the study as being voodoo science, but admit: “Certainly
radiation from Fukushima is dangerous, and could very well lead to negative health effects—even
across the Pacific.”
The fancy little picture above is a dramatization showing you the flow of radiation from the Fukushima nuclear plant. Yes, that sharp pain you just felt in your chest is the sudden realization that the image shows the radiation reaching America.
Nuclear expert Helen Caldicott called Fukushima "an unprecedented absolute disaster, multiples worse than Chernobyl. The situation is very grim and not just for the Japanese people.
Fukushima's have been operating for 40 years, and would hold about 30 times more radiation than Chernobyl.
Chernobyl killed nearly one million people and counting, according to the New York Academy of Sciences. Many deaths will never be included in the official count, because their cancers won't be connected to Chernobyl. The long term impact of a compromised immune system and the subsequent health challenges will never be officially traced to Chernobyl.
Like Chernobyl, the accident at Fukushima is of global proportions. Unusual levels of
radiation have been discovered in British Columbia, along the West Coast and East Coast of the
United
States and in Europe, and heavy contamination has been found in
oceanic waters.
Nuclear engineer Gunderson says that we’ll see a statistically meaningful increase in cancer on the West Coast of America and Canada from Fukushima. There is certainly evidence that West Coast residents – especially in Seattle, Portland and other areas near the Cascades – have been hit with some radiation. And there is certainly evidence that radioactive contamination has spread in the United States, and will continue to spread for some time to come.
Nuclear engineer Gunderson says that we’ll see a statistically meaningful increase in cancer on the West Coast of America and Canada from Fukushima. There is certainly evidence that West Coast residents – especially in Seattle, Portland and other areas near the Cascades – have been hit with some radiation. And there is certainly evidence that radioactive contamination has spread in the United States, and will continue to spread for some time to come.
Once they are ingested, inhaled, or enter your body through
a cut, their grotesque potent force cuts through your body like knife through
butter, into the cells, blood or other organs, impacting other organs and
leaving behind hideous, shocking damage.
A single alpha particle from Plutonium, Uranium, Americium or Radon can deliver a huge blast of radiation inside your body. This radiation energy can destroy your genetic material at a cellular level.
Some people are more susceptible than others:
A single alpha particle from Plutonium, Uranium, Americium or Radon can deliver a huge blast of radiation inside your body. This radiation energy can destroy your genetic material at a cellular level.
Some people are more susceptible than others:
* Those who are already sick
* Those who have weak immune systems
* The elderly
* Children, babies & the unborn
Once radiation is released into the environment it circulates and is carried with the winds until it become part of the soil and food chain. It ends up in our drinking water, on the pastures that our livestock graze on, on our vegetables and in our fruit trees.
This is particularly dangerous for humans because we are at the top of the food chain, where the higher concentrations of radionuclides are.
Most Common Diseases From Ionizing Radiation:
* leukemia
* lymphoma
* solid tumors or any organ
* bone & blood disorders
* lung cancer
* breast cancer
* endocrine disruption
* reproductive abnormalities
* accelerated aging process
* birth defects
* congenital malformations
* kidney, liver damage
These diseases and mutations don't stop with us. If ionizing radiation enters our genes, not only does it cause irreversible damage to this generation, but to future generations, as evidenced by children being born years after Chernobyl.
This isn’t a conspiracy theory,
this is happening and it’s happening right now!
But before packing up and relocating to Antarctica, a few options are available that can drastically reduce exposure to these harmful elements.
Protect and detoxify
Here are several precautions that can help shield individuals from a radioactive food supply:
- View all fish and crustaceans from the Pacific Ocean as tainted.
- Always use filtered water for cooking and drinking.
- Pay attention to the origin of dairy.
- Wash any produce thoroughly with natural soap and rinse with purified water.
- Avoid meat from contaminated regions (including wild game).
Another level of defense is explained in the article, Remove radiation from your produce with Calcium Bentonite Clay:
"You can add Calcium Bentonite Clay to your milk and drinking water if you're concerned about the possibility of contamination there as well. Add approximately 1 ounce of liquid Calcium Bentonite Clay to a gallon of organic raw milk or water. Some people prefer to let the clay settle to the bottom of the liquid and discard that portion, while others prefer to shake it up and drink them together. Either is fine."
All in all, it truly is a sad state of affairs when the idea of donning a hazmat suit simply to handle our food is not as outrageous as it once had been.
Maybe now you will consider checking out our SurvivalWatch Facebook Page, where I will be covering this and related survival topics more thoroughly in the next few days. You may want to check out my new
Surviving Radiation Facebook post on SurvivalWatch, here: http://on.fb.me/18B2MTn
~ Tom Retterbush
SOURCES & RESOURCES
Articles
Hello World! OPEN LETTER TO WHOM FUKUSHIMA
MAY CONCERN
The Continuing Fukushima
Cover-Up
Fukushima
radiation update
Fukushima
Reactor Disaster Archive 1
Fukushima
Reactor Disaster Archive 2
Japan
Times: ‘Fears marine life is being poisoned’ by nuclear material flowing from Fukushima
— Experts warn of ‘festering radioactive sore’ contaminating food chain — Tepco
flip-flop ‘shocking’
http://enenews.com/japan-times-fears-marine-life-is-being-poisoned-by-nuclear-material-flowing-from-fukushima-experts-warn-of-festering-radioactive-sore-contaminating-food-chain-tepco-flip-flop-shocking
10 Symptoms Of Radiation Sickness
Long Term Effects of Low Level Radiation- and How to Prevent
Them
10 Symptoms Of Radiation Sickness
Effects of Radiation on the Human Body
Video
Radioactive Fish, Pacific Ocean, Fukushima
Leaking MORE Radiation
Links
http://jeromiewilliams.com/2013/04/12/holy-fukushima-radiation-from-japan-is-already-killing-north-americans/
http://www.psmag.com/science/an-iodine-chaser-3523/
http://hpschapters.org/northcarolina/NSDS/iodine.pdf
http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/chart/decaysearchdirect.jsp?nuc=129I&unc=nds
http://hpschapters.org/northcarolina/NSDS/iodine.pdf
http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaqs/tfacts158.pdf
"The International Journal of Health Services alleges that 14,000 people have already died in the United States due to Fukushima!"
ReplyDeletePlease provide a link, or evidence of some sort.
"Fukushima's have been operating for 40 years, and would hold about 30 times more radiation than Chernobyl."
The length a nuclear reactor has been in service does not create a "hold" of radiation just waiting to spew out. The spent fuel rods are disposed of in radioactive storage which is the main danger of nuclear power. There is no radiation that just sits in the reactors waiting to get out.
"Nuclear engineer Gunderson says that we’ll see a statistically meaningful increase in cancer on the West Coast of America and Canada from Fukushima. There is certainly evidence that West Coast residents – especially in Seattle, Portland and other areas near the Cascades – have been hit with some radiation. And there is certainly evidence that radioactive contamination has spread in the United States, and will continue to spread for some time to come."
You're just stating that there is evidence and not showing any statistics or anything that shows us the evidence. I can say that cell phones are giving people brain tumors and there's much evidence for it throughout the entire developed world, but without showing said evidence my claims are worthless.
"A single alpha particle from Plutonium, Uranium, Americium or Radon can deliver a huge blast of radiation inside your body. This radiation energy can destroy your genetic material at a cellular level."
No, just no.....
There are 6.022x10^23 molecules of water in 18.02 g of water. That shows the massive amounts of atoms and molecules in tiny spaces. An alpha particle is a single nucleus of a Helium atom and singly is of such a minuscule risk to your body that it is completely negligible. Alpha particles, protons, and X-rays are emitted during the radioactive decay of unstable atoms, all of which happen around us daily. There are constantly trace amounts of radioactive materials around us and there always will be. Carbon-dating is only possible due to radioactive Carbon 14 in all living organisms. This explains background radiation very well, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Background_radiation
This also explains the dangers of alpha particles (not single particles as they are not dangerous on their own, that would be like a lone soldier fighting an army, they might kill one but not the whole organism), http://www.epa.gov/radiation/understand/alpha.html
"This is particularly dangerous for humans because we are at the top of the food chain, where the higher concentrations of radionuclides are."
How is that? If it is absorbed through the Earth and water, and the top of the food chain is the farthest disconnected from the Earth in terms of food ingestion than we should be safest right? Unless I'm misunderstanding something.
Ok, I took the time to read this (BTW I'm Tristan Noel, I commented on the FB page and you said I hadn't read your article, thanks for assuming....) and I've said my part. Feel free to respond and engage in intelligent debate.
However, if you don't respect me as a person and insult me I will not take you seriously. I included no personal attacks and I would trust you're capable of the same.
This comment has been removed by the author.
Deletehttp://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/medical-journal-article--14000-us-deaths-tied-to-fukushima-reactor-disaster-fallout-135859288.html
DeleteSUPER, Tristan!!! I like the provision of a link or links which helps corroborate a claim.
Deletewell informed report thank you for taking the time to share your knowledge with lay people as well.
DeleteThank you! I don't know if Nevada or Las Vegas was in danger of being affected, but your comment has taken a lot off my mind, Thank you. Now I'm going to remove this from my facebook page,
DeleteAwesome, thanks for taking the time to voice what we were thinking as we read this. There are enough reactionary fluff pieces in the media. We want to see the data, or at least show that you have data.
DeleteOne point:
"This is particularly dangerous for humans because we are at the top of the food chain, where the higher concentrations of radionuclides are."
How is that? If it is absorbed through the Earth and water, and the top of the food chain is the farthest disconnected from the Earth in terms of food ingestion than we should be safest right? Unless I'm misunderstanding something.
Look up bioaccumulation: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bioaccumulation
Firstly, lets get to the fluff of your comments. Anon above gives you a link to the 14k deaths so that is corroborated and correct.
DeleteAs for the radiation levels being bad becasue we are at the top of the food chain, the answer to that is simple but is best if explained entirely.
If a fish at the bottom of the food chain spends two days in water that has ten alpha particles in it for every days worth of water tha passes through him, he will collect 20 alpha particles (for simplicites sake I am not using scientific terms). He will aslo collect all the alpha particles on top that have been collected by the food he eats, be it plants at the bottom of the ocean (which are very energy efficient thus would absorb far less radiation as they don't need much new water per day) or living shrimp/mold etc which are, by the very nature of living beings vs plants, less energy efficient (as they need to move reproduce etc) so need more water and thus drink more radiation.
Now if we eat fish, we then may collect 25 particles per fish we eat, but if the fish is instead fead to land based animal, because a lot of the latent energy is 'pooped' out, they will need to eat more than one to transfer the same amount of energy up the food chain.
Now fish are comparatively efficient compared to land animals. They don't have to fight gravity to move as much. They spend less energy in day to day activities as humans, cats and other land based animals do, so when we get to fish eating mammals this explodes. A bird of prey may only have to eat two or three fish a day to live, but that radiation will never leave it's body and it will be eating more than the sum of its own energy just to maintain it. 3 fish = 75 atoms a day. Yet we could eat the fish for the same amount of energy to ourselves, or even the plants the fish fed on, and reduce our intake of radiation.
The overall point however, is that the further up the food chain you go, due to the nature of animals having to eat multiple times their weight of other life to live, the radiation per kg of food you consume multiplies.
I leaned this in school, but you are free to read more about it here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_flow_(ecology)
If you disbelieve in Wikipedia, lick the little numbers in the top corners of the words and it will give you a link to the verifiable site it was originally stated.
*learned
Delete*click
There are no 14K deaths - conspiracy watch yourself:
Deletehttp://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2012/01/11/garbage-in-anti-nuclear-propaganda-out-the-14000-death-fukushima-lie/
I see the list side effects from radiation. However without radiation we wouldn't have people like Captain America, Hulk, Flash, the Fantastic 4. Oh wait you were discussing fictional stuff my bad
ReplyDeleteIts fine to remind people of the dangers of radiation, but many of these claims seem to be without evidence. I realize the author of this article had good intention, but being honest with your readers is paramount. The line between opinion and fact should be made clear.
ReplyDeleteWhat do you make of this, smart guy? >>
Deletehttp://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/medical-journal-article--14000-us-deaths-tied-to-fukushima-reactor-disaster-fallout-135859288.html
Smarty pants, you must live in a cardboard box not to know or to extend common knowledge on the effects of radiation and understand that Fukushima is the biggest ever. Go and do some research on the legacy of Hiroshima/Nagasaki to have some idea of the implications and then come back and tell us about the "facts"
Deletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ITrXVJMKeQ
When was this Fukushima Daiichi Plant explosion. Give more data. There are so many things that are our to get us humans. In Utah, there is a city where cancers and sickness is rampant due to the Area 51 nuclear bombs that were blown up there. The air transports these fumes that are not predictable as to where they go. The U.S. government does not care about these people or any of us. We are just good for paying tax dollars so they can create more military control on the planet. Our world sucks.
ReplyDeleteARE YOU TOO FUCKING STUPID TO GET OUT OF YOUR PEN AND GOOGLE "FUKUSHIMA" YOU IGNORANT TWAT...
DeleteDo something about it, research yourself, start an awareness about it, it's now or never humans!
ReplyDeleteNot one reputable source on here. You also have no clue what you are talking about when it comes to nuclear power.
ReplyDeleteI WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHY YOU YOURSELF DIDN'T RECTIFY THE SITUATION BY PROVIDING GOOD LINKS, ON SECOND THOUGHTS I KNOW IT'S BECAUSE YOU'RE A SPUNK BUBBLE ON A DONKEY'S ANAL SPHINCTER...
DeleteITS YOUTUBE BUT IT'S A GOOD SOURCE
Deletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9LYClI5orMY
I AM BUTTHURT SO I WILL USE ALL CAPS
DeleteI lol'ed at the donkey thing.
DeleteLol.....drinking filtered water will not prevent the ingestion of radioactive materials....hokum!!!
DeleteCan you carbon date a spunk bubble?
ReplyDeleteI just want to say that it makes perfect sense that if you're at the top of the food chain you would be more likely to get contaminated because you would be eating everything below which would have already been contaminated.
ReplyDelete"Due to the long half-life of radiation, the whole ecosystem of the U.S. West Coast will be contaminated for the next 16 million years!"
ReplyDeleteSource? Details?
I'd be interested to know so I can plug a few numbers into this http://www.ehs.washington.edu/rso/calculator/activity_calc.shtm - assuming the numbers are solid enough
"However, Americans apparently aren't quite as ignorant as our government might have hoped, considering a recent Rasmussen Report found more than one-third of all Americans believing radiation from Fukushima caused "significant harm" in the U.S."
That is actually a misrepresentation, intentional or otherwise.
"The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey shows that 36% of American Adults believe it is at least somewhat likely that radiation from the Fukushima nuclear power plant did significant harm to the United States. However, that includes just nine percent (9%) who think that scenario is Very Likely. Fifty percent (50%) of adults say it’s not likely the radiation did any harm, including 17% who say it’s Not At All Likely. Sixteen percent (16%) are not sure."
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/japan/36_think_radiation_from_japanese_nuclear_disaster_hurt_the_u_s
Beyond that, what people think happened is hardly something to get excited about - it is well known that there is a decent sized group of people thoughout the world who are fearful of nuclear power. The question is really whether or not their concerns are valid.
"The International Journal of Health Services alleges that 14,000 people have already died in the United States due to Fukushima!"
http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/2011/12/20/researchers-trumpet-another-flawed-fukushima-death-study/
"The analysis assumes that the plume arrived on U.S. shores, spread everywhere, instantly, and started killing people immediately. It assumes that the “excess” deaths after March 20 are a real signal, not just a statistical aberration, and that every one of them is due to Fukushima radiation"
http://www.medpagetoday.com/PublicHealthPolicy/EnvironmentalHealth/30305
"Morin told MedPage Today that such an acute effect would be unlikely, unless radiation levels were four or five orders of magnitude higher than those reported by Mangano and Sherman, and the whole body of the victim was exposed.
Typically, he said, the effect of low-level ionizing radiation doesn't appear until years after the exposure."
http://www.helencaldicott.com/2011/07/internal-radioactive-emitters-invisible-tasteless-and-odorless/
"The incubation time for leukemia is five to ten years, but for solid cancers (such as breast, lung, thyroid, bone, kidney, and brain) the incubation period ranges from 15 to 70 years. All types of cancer can be induced by radiation."
"The fancy little picture above is a dramatization showing you the flow of radiation from the Fukushima nuclear plant."
No, it isn't. It's a fantasy, or if that language is a little too prosaic, it's a flat out lie.
http://www.snopes.com/photos/technology/fukushima.asp
http://www.snopes.com/photos/technology/fallout.asp
"Fukushima's have been operating for 40 years, and would hold about 30 times more radiation than Chernobyl."
Funnily enough, this seems to be an underestimate, which surprises me from the general tone of this 'report'. Apparently there's up to 85 times more radiation at Fukushima, but on further inspection, only a portion of this radiation is a threat.
"The No. 4 pool is about 100 feet above ground, is structurally damaged and is exposed to the open elements. If an earthquake or other event were to cause this pool to drain this could result in a catastrophic radiological fire involving nearly 10 times the amount of Cs-137 released by the Chernobyl accident."
http://akiomatsumura.com/2012/04/682.html
(continued)
Delete"A single alpha particle from Plutonium, Uranium, Americium or Radon can deliver a huge blast of radiation inside your body. This radiation energy can destroy your genetic material at a cellular level."
Not entirely relevant or correct. I've not seen any mention of Plutonium, Uranium, Americium or Radon leakage. The decay of Cs-137 (mentioned in previous link) is through Beta and not Alpha particles (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caesium-137). So, whilst Alpha particles can indeed do some damage if you eat them (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alpha_particle#Biological_effects), you'd have to eat quite a bit of it before it became a real issue. A single Alpha particle is very very very unlikely to do you any lasting harm, at all.
All your cells contain DNA or RNA, the destruction of a few strands of DNA/RNA is not an issue, at all. The problems arise when there is a mutation of genetic information, the likelihood of this happening as the result of alpha particles is very very small, since they can only penetrate to the depth of one or two cells.
Some interesting facts about the affects of radiation (Fukushima specific) on health, written by someone who is very anti-nuclear but who reports facts, not supposition and fear mongering.
http://www.helencaldicott.com/2011/07/internal-radioactive-emitters-invisible-tasteless-and-odorless/
Wow this is such a serious issue and yes its real and its leaking they should be building high walls around the plants with concrete and lead to ubsorb the nuclear waist please this should not be down played or joked about put the word out and get the governments to get on the ball and sheild these reactors and to stop using nuclear energy we have solar and wind technology come on people get on the ball
DeleteThis is a post from my website cheybarnes.com in regards to the Fukushima Nuclear disaster:
ReplyDeleteLast night my oldest daughter told me that when she graduates college she wants to relocate to the Hawaiian Islands and set up her medical practice. I hated to be the one to tell her that Hawaii is so contaminated with radiation from the Fukushima nuclear disaster that it would be a very poor choice of places to set up shop. Indeed, I would be reluctant to now live anywhere along the entire west coast of the U.S. or Canada for that matter. What a tragic shame, these are the most beautiful regions of our once great country.
August 21st 2013 Reuters reported that “Japan has dramatically raised its warning about the severity of a toxic water leak at the Fukushima nuclear plant; its most serious action since the plant was destroyed by an earthquake and tsunami in 2011.
“The deepening crisis at the Fukushima plant will be upgraded from a level 1 to a level three on an international scale for radiological releases”, a spokesman for Japan’s Nuclear Regulation Authority (NRA) said. This in a response to Fukushima Operator Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) announcement that about 300 tons of highly contaminated ground water is leaking- and purposefully dumped, from a storage tank designed to hold overflows, every day into the sea, to make room for more radioactive water storage.
That will mark the first time Japan has issued a warning on the International Nuclear Event Scale (INES) since three reactor meltdowns after the massive quake in March 2011. Consensus is that the problem at the Fukushima plant is growing, the fuel pools are now spent and the uranium rods are hundreds of feet melted into the ground.
In light of these developments, on August 25th 2013, Japan finally bowed to pressure from neighboring countries South Korea and China and agreed to accept international help to sort out the mess by allowing the French to help decommission and dismantle the crippled nuclear plant; this after 29 months of trying to contain radiation from Fukushima’s molten atomic cores on its own. The water leaks have so far sent more than 100 times the annual norms of radioactive elements into the ocean.
Well, it’s about time they dug their heads out of the sand, swallowed their “pride” and allowed for some international aid. Up until now they have refused all offers from other countries including Russia who offered to help back in 2011 but Japan refused their offer. The Russians have long contended that using water to cool the melted reactors was just going to make the problem worse by creating more radioactive water that needs to be disposed of. Duh, makes perfect sense to me.
Russia’s state-owned Rosatom recommended that Japan use air cooling methods to and sent Japan a 5 kilogram (11 pound) sample of thermoxide -a special absorbent to help clean up contaminated water almost three years ago, but TEPCO declined to use it.
Rosatom also formed working groups ready to help Japan on health effect assessment, decontamination, and fuel management, among others. The assistance was never used despite Russia’s qualified experience in nuclear cleanup after the Chernobyl disaster of 1986. We live on a very small planet, and we now know that there’s no such thing as a national nuclear accident. They are all international accidents. And after Chernobyl, the Russians would know.
There are not only neighboring countries for Japan to deal with, but also mounting pressure to contain the problem before the 2020 Tokyo Olympics. That’s just over six years away. Gee too bad caesium-137 has a half-life of 30.17 and plutonium has a half-life of 88 years- not quite enough time to get it all cleaned up.
Visit my website cheybarnes.com to read more
You sure did take a lot of time to type out a long novel of complete BS!
ReplyDeletehttp://www.snopes.com/photos/technology/fukushima.asp
hello, I am only young and barely have a knowledge of nuclear contamination and what not. but, in our worlds ocean does a current not run the entire way around the world connecting every ocean, lake, river, e.t.c? if so then why is it simply just the " western America " that is being affected? would the worlds current not push the radioactive material throughout infecting the whole world?
ReplyDeletehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Corrientes-oceanicas.gif
Delete100%
DeleteI think im going to be sick
ReplyDeleteof course all the ocean will be affected and food supplies. it will also spread and affect everyone. How could it not? Even a little radiation isnt good so dont tell me amounts of this magnatude wont hurt anyone? Its killing and contaminating marine life, isnt that bad enough. if its "not a big deal, why are other countries trying to help japan clean it up. It is what it is. Very dangerous to everyone. When marine life dies and washes up on land........read your bible. its out of our hands.
ReplyDeleteWhoever wrote this article, I would like to meet him/her in person. In order to properly judge their intellectual inadequacies in person.
ReplyDeleteThank You
"Due to the long half-life of radiation, the whole ecosystem of the U.S. West Coast will be contaminated for the next 16 million years!"
ReplyDeleteRadiation is not an element.
I know right! I thought the same thing, I was like wtf, seriously?
Deletegeez, what happened, I lived in Hiroshima over 50 years and I'm still healthy...
ReplyDeleteBullshit; see http://www.snopes.com/photos/technology/fukushima.asp
ReplyDeleteThis is so complete bullshit: http://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2012/01/11/garbage-in-anti-nuclear-propaganda-out-the-14000-death-fukushima-lie/
ReplyDeleteI never knew there were so many ignorant people in the world ! Radiation is a killer..always has been always will be......have they all forgotten how many people that work at reactors get leukemia ??? do they forget about being told their whole life that radiation is dangerous ??? So now all of a sudden its no big deal ?? I think that whst we have here a whole bunch of people scared to death because were all gonna die and they are going to deny it even when their hair is falling out in clumps and they have thyroid disease....Im sorry fellow humans...these are the facts....goodbye my friends !! Namaste.
ReplyDeleteYou fucking whack jobs! quit dumbing people down and spreading lies!
ReplyDeletehttp://bqs.usgs.gov/fukushima/
I like how anonymous stays anonymous. There are people on these websites who monitor them so they can debunk them and assassinate the credibility. always check things out independently of others. with credible resources.
ReplyDeleteSo holidaying on the west coast is no outta the question
ReplyDeletehttp://www.radiation.org/reading/pubs/HS42_1F.pdf
ReplyDeleteUghhh wtf I'm so confused! All these sources could be biased and bull shit who to believe??!
ReplyDelete